The value is 70 Saturday, Feb 16 2008 

People mumble about the economy and the job market but the simple truth of the matter is that people have progressively been obsoleting others and themselves for decades ever since the advent of the computer. Is this a good time to mention that I do not trust various scientific attempts like true artificial intelligence?

Anyway, when a machine can tell you if something tastes good or not, it’s only a matter of time until machines tell you everything. Ah actually isn’t it already that time? I mean what are you doing right now? So machines already tell us everything (you probably didn’t know this but at the least they are telling us whether our water is supposedly safe to drink or not and probably have been for 20 years), I guess what really is only a matter of time would be when we are all ourselves machines (there must be some portion of people that are mechanical if not necessarily computerized already).

That reminds me of a severely autistic girl I knew who was a big “transhumanism” advocate. As a foot note while I don’t imagine that everyone with Asperger syndrome is a transhumanist, or that vice-versa everyone that’s enthusiastic about transhumanism has some aspect like that, this person certainly knew quite a few who were. Personally I think that it would be better for humans to disappear than to only be able to live on as cyborgs. But at the same time if someone offered me a new body on my deathbed I’d probably take it.

Because you know, it’s not really that humans want to live forever. It’s just that they don’t want to disappear.

Peace and plane fare Saturday, Feb 16 2008 

I am reflecting upon the world lately. There are many things that I do not know, and so perhaps the results of this reflection are skewed. But it occurs to me that a world without war may some day be possible. This is the conclusion I came to after first reflecting on what the reasons for war are.

As to what that is, I think that going to war ultimately comes down to  attempting to acquire or preserve “resources”. I am using the broadest definition of that term possible. For the purposes of my musings even concepts like “faith” counts as a resource let alone any actual person or persons. It’s worth noting that participating in a war for most so called major countries now is typically more of an attempt at gaining or maintaining power in their own country rather than the old conquest model of warfare. Anyway in this view I have stripped away all possible romance from war, the death of romance is always the goal of science after all.   So if the reason for starting a war always comes down to “resources” then what are the reasons not to go to war.

This again is, in the broadest sense possible, first and foremost resources. However I have a harder time stripping away romantic notions when examining this matter. Things I think of are “compassion” and “empathy”. And perhaps if there was a time for ideals, coming up with reasons to not have war is that time. I actually have no idea whether or not war is really a bad thing for the world but that’s a separate issue.

In any case the thing that’s necessary for a person in order to kill during war is the devaluation of the life of another compared to anything else coupled with the belief that if they do not kill the thing they value will be compromised. It’s surprisingly easy to meet these conditions due mostly to propaganda and misconceptions. I suppose you could also say that “misunderstanding” is necessary. If I am not mistaken the main reason that a soldier kills during war is in order to not be killed themselves. So we could say that fear is the motivator, and it is a powerful one. Conversely the main reason people kill in general is out of anger. Both are reactionary, strongly compelling emotions. And generally both are preyed upon to incite, prolong, or continue war in particular but many conflicts in general.

Now on the other hand in order to not be willing to kill a person in general you need to place a greater value on their life in particular or human life in general than on losing any likely thing at the specific time. For examples I think that a lot of people are willing to die rather than kill, some might even be willing to suffer (i.e. endure torture) rather than kill, or be dominated in one way or another. However a lot of people are not willing to let those they care about face harm rather than kill when given the opportunity to do so. Whether or not mothers who say that they would kill for their children would actually be able to do so when faced with some sort of hypothetical dilemmna that I won’t even bother coming up with is another matter.

Value or devalue, humanize or dehumanize. Well it’s impossible to eliminate conflict and still have a free society in my opinion so I don’t even think about it. But in order to end warfare the first thing that would be necessary is a substantiation if not necessarily an equality of resources. Every likely region if not necessarily every specific body (from countries down to cities) would need to to be self-sufficient. This is of course not the case as things stand. The second thing that would be necessary is a measure of equality so as to enhance understanding. At the least this would mean everyone being able to speak the same language, whether or not only having one language would be necessary is debatable but would certainly be dull. Third is a tough thing to phrase, again at the least there needs to be a freedom to travel and communicate and interact with any other person in any other part of the world. Whether the elimination of boundaries and borders would actually be that good of a thing or not from a logistics standpoint (being too associated leads to conflict, not being associated enough also leads to conflict)… Actually I just don’t think that’s possible for people to cope with. Whether or not a shared religion or the abandonment of religion in general would be necessary is not a matter I’m able to analyze at this time. In order to meet my third point certain rules in religions that are also laws in some countries would have to be discarded. I could write a book about that subject (and perhaps I should) though so I won’t go into them.

Well possibly the compassion cultivated by achieving the second and third points I just outlined, which are probably really quite a few more points than that, could overcome severe resource issues (it’s hard to say with a straight face that there will be NO energy shortage issues in the next decade) but conversely the opposite might be even more likely. If people have everything they want and need then they’re less likely to try and take anything. Then again we are talking about humans, they’ll always find a reason to fight. Always.

This is unrelated but instant espresso tastes terrible and smells worse. I have to imagine that like most things instant espresso is worse than real espresso but I am not an enthusiast so for all I know cat urine is the desired smell. It does give you a wakeup kick of course, and that’s got to be the only reason for any type of instant coffee.

Because it has a nice color Saturday, Feb 16 2008 

I actually have a themed title this time and everything so without further ado let me regale you with my impressions of the Busou Renkin 武総錬金 shounen (boys) manga (japanese comics) series.

The series ended about a couple of years ago after barely 10 volumes (the 10th volume had the final chapter, an unrelated but similar one shot manga and a final bonus story) is by the creator of the popular Rurouni Kenshin series Watsuki Nobuhiro (family name first from here on in). For the most part the series is about the male protagonist Mutou Kazuki and the female protagonist Tsumura Tokiko using the “alchemical armaments” (busou renkin) which manifest from the alchemically created alloy known as “kakugane” to fight against the “alchemical creatures” known as “homunculus”. In other words it’s a whole lot of nonsense. To me the emphasis on hidden alchemy in a world otherwise contemporary to ours (as opposed to open usage of alchemy in an alternate world like Full Metal Alchemist) and the way the story plays out is ridiculously similar to Le Cirque de Karakuri/karakuri circus (からくりサーカス) and Kazuki looks too much like Sagara Sousuke from Full Metal Panic while Tokiko with a big scar across her face from a blade is reminiscent of the titular character from Rurouni Kenshin. Well supposedly the sources for all such things (aside from Tokiko) are different and it is of course true that I am familiar with many incidental works. But those are just some of the many things that stuck out to me (probably because I like full metal panic and Karakuri Circus).

That said, even though I have a pile of criticisms for the series I actually rather like it. The main reason for this is Tokiko. The only times you see such idealized strong and capable female characters is in works by males. I suppose this is a similar reason as to why I liked Shakugan no Shana (the first anime series of it that is) even though it had a pathetic male lead. And as it turned out for the first time in a long time I was satisfied by the ending. There is a moderately long final bonus(I’m assuming it wasn’t serialized) chapter in the 10th volume of the manga (there’s also a “one-shot” work that’s a bit amusing which has apparently now been turned into a new series) which I found highly amusing and was a good note to end the series on after it had frankly otherwise ended mostly by sweeping all kinds of things under the rug. So just take my recommendation for the series if you can stomach a shounen fighting manga. As to why I read shounen fighting manga even though I always lambast such things it’s because that’s about all I can read properly with my level of japanese and at my age I’d rather read a vaguely occult fighting series than a school girl’s romance story (which is possibly even something I could translate if I tried hard) even though both are tedious.

That said, I get the impression that rather than being planned for the length that the series ended out at it was a little bit closer to it being canceled. Certainly I did not anticipate the series ending when it did. But at about the halfway point of the series the final objective was introduced and then things were kind of pushed along from there. Arguably with the extremely vague premise from my summary which is the hallmark of shounen manga so that it can be serialized for as long as it’s popular it could have gone on forever like One Piece is poised to do (the author of One Piece, Oda Eiichiro is a former assistant of Watsuki). And perhaps it would have done so if things went differently, but there was definitely some reason for it ending other than trying to keep the story a respectable length rather than having it constantly repeating itself (One Piece repeats the exact same pattern(s) over and over again). My guess was that it ultimately wasn’t that popular in comparison to the likes of the big 4 of Jump (prince of tennis (did that ever end?), bleach (may or may not be winding down… in a year or three), one piece (I doubt it will end), and naruto (probably will not end for a while due to popularity but is poised to end at any time) since it wasn’t particularly original. I could say the same thing about Anzai Nobuyuki’s work  MAR which other than the setting was almost exactly the same as his previous work “flame of Rekka” (烈火の炎 rekka no honoo that’s all the different kanji used for “fire” right there). hmm well honestly the whole world is in kind of a slump right now so that’s inevitable right?

This may or may not be the time and place to muse on the subject since I probably could have gotten another post out of it, but I think that it’s a lot tougher to stay fresh as a deadline restricted established artist than it is to come up with something that stands out when you yourself stand out. There’s a lot of pressure for a successful artist (writer, creator, director, illustrator, sculptor, painter, whatever) to have the same or greater  success with subsequent works. So even when the artist in question does actually improve, it might not be enough to meet expectations. For example, almost all aspects of Busou Renkin are superior to Rurouni Kenshin, starting with art. Originality is actually an issue with both series but having alchemy as a theme in manga is by and far less common than having “samurai and ninjas” as a theme in manga so there is that. But the timing was better for Kenshin, a lot better, and so, in my opinion, the weakness of Watsuki as a story teller was more exposed in busou renkin since the timing for it was frankly terrible (the same could be said of watsuki’s other failed work “gun blaze west” but honestly that one just kind of sucked anyway).

Hmm that timing thing is something else I could probably turn into its own entry but I can’t remember things that well from the last millennium (ah what a great feeling it is to say “last millennium”) and as it’s not like I was in japan and it was harder to get ahold of anime and manga then than now I may not have been really that aware of the situation. But let’s see, as far as anime anyway in the 80s I think of mecha series, in the 90s I think of crappy love comedy series, in the 00s I think of works that are just repeating everything that came before them with recently an emphasis being placed on somewhat “aimed at otaku” series.  Hmm yeah even now I don’t really have a good sense of what’s that popular in manga although it seems like action series are still pretty popular for shounen manga and in shoujo manga the most popular series include one female character surrounded by lots of male characters. Which is amusingly the inverse of the succesful 90s “harem anime” formula (Tenchi Muyo always being cited in the west as an originator of this) where you had one guy surrounded by a lot of girls who liked him for some reason. Typically there are slightly better reasons in these shoujo series I’m thinking of, and also there are usually only 2 or 3 characters actively pursuing the lead rather than 6 or 10, and the emphasis is generally social drama rather than action, observational comedy rather than slapstick, and so on but really…

By the way you might notice that I’m saying that the types of series that are popular now are like busou renkin, hell some of them are even by people with a relation to the guy responsible for it, but the more popular a type of story is the harder it is to gain distinction for that type of story. And so the ones with the most exposure typically are the ones to flourish. Ah now we might be moving into business models rather than creative trends so I’ll drop off here.

Exactly what “business acumen” a parasite rambling blogger has I’ll leave to your imagination.