Recently there was a certain incident involving Eliot Spitzer the governor of New York. I don’t particularly have anything to say about the incident itself but I did notice a certain trend in the commentary and felt that it was worth commenting on. That is, everyone calls Spitzer a hypocrite for outwardly being such a moralist, to the point that the criminal investigation he was caught in was just the type that he had been an advocate of, only to have been using a high class prostitute.
Now, whatever your opinion of his actions is, he broke various laws and got caught so that makes him a criminal. But it’s almost as if the hypocrisy of his situation is really what people are scorning. And I thought about that for a minute. Though it may be hypocrisy to be seeing a whore on one hand and increasing the penalties related to prostitution on another, isn’t that actually a natural guilt response? Thinking about my own life, there are the things I do and the things I advocate, and they aren’t necessarily symmetrical. For example I don’t think that there’s anything inherently wrong about a criminal saying to someone “don’t commit crime” and in fact it represents guilt and perhaps penance. It’s pretty stupid to be a criminal if you think it’s so wrong, and it is hypocritical, but it’s not bad to say it’s wrong.
So, forgetting about Spitzer in particular what I want to say is that perhaps people do not automatically deserve to be scorned for being hypocritical in normal situations because hypocrisy is a pretty normal human response. Sort of like taking a shit I think. Yeah being hypocritical is exactly like taking a shit, you’re spewing crap one way and trying to clean it up another way. Although so saying I can’t think of any situation offhand where a person is particularly hypocritical that they don’t deserve scorn for something so maybe it’s a moot point.
Back to Spitzer let me reiterate that my point is that it actually makes a lot of sense that he took such a strong moralist approach if he himself wasn’t able to live up to those morals. Although a typical human behavior is to do everything possible to secure advantage, overcompensating in the face of guilt from lapsed morality is a typical social reaction. In Spitzer’s case apparently the latter won out. Although it is of course possible that he is a particularly immoral person and all of his other actions that indicated otherwise were intended to reap some kind of illicit benefit though from what I’ve heard that doesn’t seem to be the case. Didn’t I have nothing to say about the incident? I don’t think that was hypocritical in this, the term fails me but isn’t it moronic? I mean look I could even go back and delete such things so yeah, moronic.